<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feed Readers A-Plenty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about Joe Kissell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-171</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Same here, with what DMW said. I added ITotD to my Google Homepage, so each time I fire up Firefox, my homepage shows the last three &#039;headlines&#039; from ITotD. From there I can click on a headline and read the full article on your page if I am interested.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, that&#039;s where I heard of you, but like I said, I can (and do, frequently) click through to your page. Not sure if somehow that&#039;s not getting counted for you or what, but I&#039;d imagine there are a lot of us out there with the same scenario. Good luck figuring out what is going on with the numbers! And thanks for the interesting posts.   :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>Same here, with what DMW said. I added ITotD to my Google Homepage, so each time I fire up Firefox, my homepage shows the last three &#8216;headlines&#8217; from ITotD. From there I can click on a headline and read the full article on your page if I am interested.</p>

<p>So, that&#8217;s where I heard of you, but like I said, I can (and do, frequently) click through to your page. Not sure if somehow that&#8217;s not getting counted for you or what, but I&#8217;d imagine there are a lot of us out there with the same scenario. Good luck figuring out what is going on with the numbers! And thanks for the interesting posts.   :)</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-777</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Same here, with what DMW said. I added ITotD to my Google Homepage, so each time I fire up Firefox, my homepage shows the last three &#039;headlines&#039; from ITotD. From there I can click on a headline and read the full article on your page if I am interested.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, that&#039;s where I heard of you, but like I said, I can (and do, frequently) click through to your page. Not sure if somehow that&#039;s not getting counted for you or what, but I&#039;d imagine there are a lot of us out there with the same scenario. Good luck figuring out what is going on with the numbers! And thanks for the interesting posts.   :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>Same here, with what DMW said. I added ITotD to my Google Homepage, so each time I fire up Firefox, my homepage shows the last three &#8216;headlines&#8217; from ITotD. From there I can click on a headline and read the full article on your page if I am interested.</p>

<p>So, that&#8217;s where I heard of you, but like I said, I can (and do, frequently) click through to your page. Not sure if somehow that&#8217;s not getting counted for you or what, but I&#8217;d imagine there are a lot of us out there with the same scenario. Good luck figuring out what is going on with the numbers! And thanks for the interesting posts.   :)</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kissell</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;DMW: So Google is actually suggesting ITotD as an option? Cool. (I didn&#039;t see that in my own Google Reader account, but I&#039;m not complaining.) That explains a lot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to our logs, 73.8% of our visitors are &quot;vastly ordinary,&quot; so you&#039;re in good company! ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t worry about enjoying the fruits of our labors for free. I&#039;m sure others with greater means will compensate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>DMW: So Google is actually suggesting ITotD as an option? Cool. (I didn&#8217;t see that in my own Google Reader account, but I&#8217;m not complaining.) That explains a lot.</p>

<p>According to our logs, 73.8% of our visitors are &#8220;vastly ordinary,&#8221; so you&#8217;re in good company! ;-)</p>

<p>Don&#8217;t worry about enjoying the fruits of our labors for free. I&#8217;m sure others with greater means will compensate.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kissell</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-776</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;DMW: So Google is actually suggesting ITotD as an option? Cool. (I didn&#039;t see that in my own Google Reader account, but I&#039;m not complaining.) That explains a lot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to our logs, 73.8% of our visitors are &quot;vastly ordinary,&quot; so you&#039;re in good company! ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t worry about enjoying the fruits of our labors for free. I&#039;m sure others with greater means will compensate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>DMW: So Google is actually suggesting ITotD as an option? Cool. (I didn&#8217;t see that in my own Google Reader account, but I&#8217;m not complaining.) That explains a lot.</p>

<p>According to our logs, 73.8% of our visitors are &#8220;vastly ordinary,&#8221; so you&#8217;re in good company! ;-)</p>

<p>Don&#8217;t worry about enjoying the fruits of our labors for free. I&#8217;m sure others with greater means will compensate.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMW</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>DMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-169</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi! I&#039;m pretty limited in my understanding of how the internet works. And I can&#039;t speak for the other 99,999 or so people. But here&#039;s how I found your ITotD website: it was on the list of options to include on my Google HomePage.
I would consider myself a &quot;vastly ordinary&quot; visitor if you need that for your demographic statistics! Ha! Ha!
I love interesting and random information. The most valuable pieces of information I got from the website were the links to your wife&#039;s Introvert website and from there to The Introvert Advantage.  The other pieces of information just make my day more interesting.
Unfortunately, I am not only an introverted lover of random things. I am also poor. So I apologize at this end of it for getting a cheapskate&#039;s enjoyment out of your hard work, for whatever time you are able to continue doing it. All I have to give back is my Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>Hi! I&#8217;m pretty limited in my understanding of how the internet works. And I can&#8217;t speak for the other 99,999 or so people. But here&#8217;s how I found your ITotD website: it was on the list of options to include on my Google HomePage.
I would consider myself a &#8220;vastly ordinary&#8221; visitor if you need that for your demographic statistics! Ha! Ha!
I love interesting and random information. The most valuable pieces of information I got from the website were the links to your wife&#8217;s Introvert website and from there to The Introvert Advantage.  The other pieces of information just make my day more interesting.
Unfortunately, I am not only an introverted lover of random things. I am also poor. So I apologize at this end of it for getting a cheapskate&#8217;s enjoyment out of your hard work, for whatever time you are able to continue doing it. All I have to give back is my Thanks.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMW</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>DMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi! I&#039;m pretty limited in my understanding of how the internet works. And I can&#039;t speak for the other 99,999 or so people. But here&#039;s how I found your ITotD website: it was on the list of options to include on my Google HomePage.
I would consider myself a &quot;vastly ordinary&quot; visitor if you need that for your demographic statistics! Ha! Ha!
I love interesting and random information. The most valuable pieces of information I got from the website were the links to your wife&#039;s Introvert website and from there to The Introvert Advantage.  The other pieces of information just make my day more interesting.
Unfortunately, I am not only an introverted lover of random things. I am also poor. So I apologize at this end of it for getting a cheapskate&#039;s enjoyment out of your hard work, for whatever time you are able to continue doing it. All I have to give back is my Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>Hi! I&#8217;m pretty limited in my understanding of how the internet works. And I can&#8217;t speak for the other 99,999 or so people. But here&#8217;s how I found your ITotD website: it was on the list of options to include on my Google HomePage.
I would consider myself a &#8220;vastly ordinary&#8221; visitor if you need that for your demographic statistics! Ha! Ha!
I love interesting and random information. The most valuable pieces of information I got from the website were the links to your wife&#8217;s Introvert website and from there to The Introvert Advantage.  The other pieces of information just make my day more interesting.
Unfortunately, I am not only an introverted lover of random things. I am also poor. So I apologize at this end of it for getting a cheapskate&#8217;s enjoyment out of your hard work, for whatever time you are able to continue doing it. All I have to give back is my Thanks.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Joe&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Further Thoughts on ITotD&#8217;s 4th Anniversary</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Joe&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Further Thoughts on ITotD&#8217;s 4th Anniversary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-168</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] of readers, before the rate of popularity began to increase significantly. Today, in addition to all those FeedBurner readers, the site is getting vastly more &#8220;ordinary&#8221; visitors than it did a year ago, and the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>[...] of readers, before the rate of popularity began to increase significantly. Today, in addition to all those FeedBurner readers, the site is getting vastly more &#8220;ordinary&#8221; visitors than it did a year ago, and the [...]</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kissell</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-167</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;me: So glad you&#039;re enjoying the articles! Even if Google were caching the page somehow, which I doubt, those extra visitors would still show up in the form of AdSense impressions, but they&#039;re not. (It&#039;s in Google&#039;s best interest to make sure people are seeing the ads, because that&#039;s how they make money.) But the real mystery is where those 100,000 people came from, how they found out about the site, since other visitors account for less than a tenth of that figure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>me: So glad you&#8217;re enjoying the articles! Even if Google were caching the page somehow, which I doubt, those extra visitors would still show up in the form of AdSense impressions, but they&#8217;re not. (It&#8217;s in Google&#8217;s best interest to make sure people are seeing the ads, because that&#8217;s how they make money.) But the real mystery is where those 100,000 people came from, how they found out about the site, since other visitors account for less than a tenth of that figure.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kissell</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-774</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;me: So glad you&#039;re enjoying the articles! Even if Google were caching the page somehow, which I doubt, those extra visitors would still show up in the form of AdSense impressions, but they&#039;re not. (It&#039;s in Google&#039;s best interest to make sure people are seeing the ads, because that&#039;s how they make money.) But the real mystery is where those 100,000 people came from, how they found out about the site, since other visitors account for less than a tenth of that figure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>me: So glad you&#8217;re enjoying the articles! Even if Google were caching the page somehow, which I doubt, those extra visitors would still show up in the form of AdSense impressions, but they&#8217;re not. (It&#8217;s in Google&#8217;s best interest to make sure people are seeing the ads, because that&#8217;s how they make money.) But the real mystery is where those 100,000 people came from, how they found out about the site, since other visitors account for less than a tenth of that figure.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-166</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I assume Google has their way to bypass your hit detection system. And as I have tested, both Google reader and Google homepage take you right into the full article. So it&#039;s probably safe to say those 100,000 people are not just reading the first two parapraphs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;btw, good job on the itotd articles.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>I assume Google has their way to bypass your hit detection system. And as I have tested, both Google reader and Google homepage take you right into the full article. So it&#8217;s probably safe to say those 100,000 people are not just reading the first two parapraphs.</p>

<p>btw, good job on the itotd articles.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-773</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I assume Google has their way to bypass your hit detection system. And as I have tested, both Google reader and Google homepage take you right into the full article. So it&#039;s probably safe to say those 100,000 people are not just reading the first two parapraphs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;btw, good job on the itotd articles.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>I assume Google has their way to bypass your hit detection system. And as I have tested, both Google reader and Google homepage take you right into the full article. So it&#8217;s probably safe to say those 100,000 people are not just reading the first two parapraphs.</p>

<p>btw, good job on the itotd articles.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kissell</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;me: The thing is, every &quot;jump&quot; to the full article should register as a hit on our Web site. But we&#039;re not getting 100,000 hits a day; in fact, even 10,000 is higher than usual. I&#039;ve sent in an inquiry to Google to see if they can help unravel this mystery!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>me: The thing is, every &#8220;jump&#8221; to the full article should register as a hit on our Web site. But we&#8217;re not getting 100,000 hits a day; in fact, even 10,000 is higher than usual. I&#8217;ve sent in an inquiry to Google to see if they can help unravel this mystery!</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kissell</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;me: The thing is, every &quot;jump&quot; to the full article should register as a hit on our Web site. But we&#039;re not getting 100,000 hits a day; in fact, even 10,000 is higher than usual. I&#039;ve sent in an inquiry to Google to see if they can help unravel this mystery!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>me: The thing is, every &#8220;jump&#8221; to the full article should register as a hit on our Web site. But we&#8217;re not getting 100,000 hits a day; in fact, even 10,000 is higher than usual. I&#8217;ve sent in an inquiry to Google to see if they can help unravel this mystery!</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-164</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;nearly 100,000 people are seemingly very interested in reading the first two paragraphs of every ITotD article&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;from google homepage. you will jump right into the full article. which is like 99% of the readers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>&#8220;nearly 100,000 people are seemingly very interested in reading the first two paragraphs of every ITotD article&#8221;</p>

<p>from google homepage. you will jump right into the full article. which is like 99% of the readers.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://joekissell.com/2007/03/25/feed-readers-a-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.cc/jk/103#comment-771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;nearly 100,000 people are seemingly very interested in reading the first two paragraphs of every ITotD article&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;from google homepage. you will jump right into the full article. which is like 99% of the readers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p></p><p>&#8220;nearly 100,000 people are seemingly very interested in reading the first two paragraphs of every ITotD article&#8221;</p>

<p>from google homepage. you will jump right into the full article. which is like 99% of the readers.</p>
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

