Mac Stuff

MacTech 25: Who, me?

When I turned 40 in January, I declared that the next 10 years would be my Decade of Wealth and Influence. (My 30s were, at least in theory, my Decade of Risk. That’s a story for another day.) Six months in, I can’t say I’m making much progress in the wealth department, but much to my surprise, at least some people seem to think I’m influential. I’ve been named one of MacTech’s 25 most influential people in the Macintosh community—I even get my picture in a printed magazine. Weird. My blurb in the article, featuring a now somewhat outdated bio (I really should update my “about” page a little more frequently), is on this page.

The article, cribbed as it was from (an earlier version of) my description of myself on this site, doesn’t say why it is that people think I’m an influential figure. And I find the whole thing curious, in a way, because even though I write an awful lot about Macs, I don’t really write with the goal of changing anyone’s mind about anything. I help people to get their work done and solve problems, and I report some news, but in terms of offering actual opinions, I haven’t said much beyond “you really really really need good backups.” Even Interesting Thing of the Day, which now has well over 150,000 feed readers, is merely expository in nature, not hortatory. Not that I’m complaining or anything; it’s just that I honestly don’t know who I’ve influenced to do what. But, you know, I’m OK with being famous for being famous.

Anyway, I’m in really good company: four other TidBITS personalities are on the list, along with numerous other Mac movers and shakers I respect a great deal. I’m honored to be counted among the Mac illuminati.

Tools to Make Every Mac User's Life Easier

Last week on Datamation, I wrote about my Top 10 Mac Productivity Enhancements. Of course, Macs are pretty easy to use straight out of the box, but there are a bunch of tools—some free, some inexpensive—that can make a variety of day-to-day tasks vastly more convenient.

My very favorite such add-on of all time is LaunchBar, which has saved me, over the years, countless hours of clicking and searching for things. With just a few keystrokes I can open almost anything I need to use on a regular basis, and I can’t stand using Macs that don’t have it installed. (And yes, I’m well aware of such similar apps as Quicksilver and Butler. I’ve tried them and they’re OK, but I keep coming back to the simple elegance of LaunchBar.)

Many of the tools I mentioned in the article follow a theme: they reduce mousing, keystrokes, or both, in a variety of ways and across many different applictations. Sure, they may take some getting used to, but once you’ve gotten into the habit, you’ll wonder how you lived without them.

Had I written that article today, I might well have mentioned Coda, the new multipurpose Web development tool from Panic. I’ve been a fan of their Transmit FTP client for a long time, and Coda has many of the same elegant touches. It combines an FTP engine with a collaborative text editor (based on SubEthaEdit) and several other tools needed for Web design and testing: a CSS editor, a live preview, and a terminal, plus reference materials on HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and PHP—all in one window. Mighty nice. I’m exactly their target audience, too: the kind of guy who usually has three or four different apps open to do that combination of tasks and who would prefer to do them all with less clutter. The price is a bit on the high side, in my opinion—in particular, I wish they offered more of a discount for existing Transmit users. But so far, I’m really digging it.

Fighting Spam, Part 312

Here’s a news flash for you: the spam epidemic hasn’t quite been solved yet. In the years since junk email began to be a problem, all sorts of putative solutions have appeared, ranging from tougher laws to improved server-based tools and the effective, but irritating, challenge-response systems used by an increasing number of ISPs. And yet, the flood continues. For reasons that continue to baffle me, apparently there are enough people in the world clicking those links and buying what the spammers are selling to make it worth their while to continue sending out messages by the billions.

Your last line of defense against spam is your email client—or, if its built-in filter isn’t cutting it, a third-party add-on. I cover the current range of options for Mac users in Spam Filters for your Mac: Six Choices, which was published today at Datamation. Although I covered earlier versions of many of the same programs in Take Control of Spam with Apple Mail, this article provides the most up-to-date information I have. If you use a Mac and find yourself frustrated with the amount of spam in your Inbox, I urge you to check it out.

[Update: In my Datamation article, I made the following statement:

I keep wishing I could get SpamSieve to give me more granular control over how it treats suspected spam. For example, I’d like truly obvious spam to be trashed immediately, and I’d like spam from different accounts to be routed to different junk mailboxes.

As it turns out, both of those things are possible. SpamSieve author Michael Tsai pointed me to the instructions for doing so, though the procedures are not obvious from looking at the SpamSieve UI. The process varies by email client, but this page shows how to get the most obvious spam to go directly to the Trash in Apple Mail, and this one describes the process for creating separate junk mailboxes for each account.]

This might also be a good time to mention my article Stop Today’s Spam in the April issue of Macworld, which focuses not on third-party clients but on working with rules in Mail and Entourage and other helpful tricks.

Bandwagon Undo and Redo

So you know that whole Bandwagon launch thing that was supposed to happen last week? Well, funny story. The newly launched service lasted all of a couple of days before it was taken offline; it’s now being completely retooled for yet another grand opening in April.

As near as I can determine, what happened was approximately this: A surprisingly large number of people signed up right away for the all-the-iTunes-you-can-back-up-online service at $69 per year. But most of those people had far greater iTunes storage needs than even the company’s most generous estimates. The Bandwagon folks did the math and discovered that they couldn’t possibly afford all the necessary storage space, CPU power, and bandwidth—they’d actually be losing money on the service. So they stopped accepting new subscribers, told the existing subscribers that they’d be getting their money refunded, and announced that a very different version of Bandwagon will go online in a couple of months. The early adopters, having already received a refund, will also get a free year’s worth of service on the new system for their troubles.

So what is this new and improved Bandwagon? You’ll still be backing up your iTunes stuff online. But now, instead of storing it on Bandwagon’s servers, you’ll be storing it on Amazon’s S3 (Simple Storage Service), which is some of the cheapest online storage you can get. You’ll pay Amazon.com directly for the storage space, and you’ll pay Bandwagon either $24 or $36 per year for, apparently, the use of their application. (At the higher price you also get syncing between two Macs, though I’m unsure of the details at this point.) Once again, Bandwagon is offering a discount (half off) for people who sign up before the official launch; you can read about that on the Bandwagon site. And once again, they’re offering an incentive to bloggers, but this time they’re looking for help with beta testing more than publicity, and those who provide helpful bug reports will get a six-month subscription free.

Now, I’ve been hoping for some time that some Mac backup app would directly support S3, so that’s cool. But the fact that it’s limited to iTunes content is a big minus. Also, and I’ve told the Bandwagon folks this more than once, their new pricing structure is a bad idea. They’re effectively asking you to rent their software. Since you’re no longer backing up to their servers, you’re not paying them for a service as such. I can’t comprehend why they don’t do what every other software company does and simply sell licenses to their software. They could charge much more than $36, and even come out with paid upgrades every year or two, so they’d be making more money. But their customers wouldn’t have to feel like they’re renting software by the month, and they wouldn’t have to make recurring payments to both Bandwagon and S3.

There’s another issue, too: S3 in its current form is still pretty much for geeks. Signing up for, and configuring, and account is somewhat complex. And it’s an extra step (or several) that each Bandwagon user must now go through. Bandwagon says they’ll also support other varieties of online storage in the future, but details are sketchy at the moment.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a less competent product launch, and I’ve seen some doozies. When you’re launching a backup service, you want to instill confidence in your customers, including confidence that you’ve done your homework and have a solid business plan. Launching, unlaunching, retooling, and relaunching doesn’t give me warm fuzzies. The pricing is weird and unfortunate. And the service is unnecessarily limited. But perhaps that’ll all change—maybe several times—before the next launch.